[PATCH] More explicit return codes for sigismember(3)

[Garrett Cooper]

Hi,
    I found this change kicking around my tree from a while back. It
brings the manpage for sigismember(3) more in line with the POSIX
definition [1] in the RETURN CODES section by explicitly noting that
sigismember(3) returns 0 if a signal is valid and not a part of the
set passed in.
    If someone could review and commit the change, it would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
-Garrett

[1] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sigismember.html
(SUS Issue 6 -- but the wording for the manpage is the same in SUS
Issue 7).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: more-explicit-sigismember-return-codes.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 578 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20101114/b7375a2b/more-explicit-sigismember-return-codes.obj