Slow disk access while rsync - what should I tune?
Jonathan McKeown
j.mckeown at ru.ac.za
Mon Nov 1 07:17:03 UTC 2010
On Sunday 31 October 2010 22:44:25 Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :> and the output produced by dump is not live-accessible whereas a
> :> snapshot / live filesystem copy is. That makes the dump fairly
> :> worthless for anything other than catastrophic recovery.
> :
> :Ever heard of "restore -i"?
>
> Have you ever tried to restore a single file from a 2 Terrabyte dump
> file ? Or even better, if you are using incremental dumps, try
> restoring a single file from 6 dump files.
>
> I'm not saying that dump/restore is completely unusable, I'm saying
> that it MOSTLY unusable for the use cases people have today for
> backups.
I'd argue that if you're routinely restoring single files, you aren't managing
your time or your users' expectations properly.
Backups are /for/ catastrophic recovery, imo, and users shouldn't expect
systems staff to be routinely restoring single files they've inadvertently
deleted. Users need to realise that when you delete something it goes away:
that's what delete does, which is why you're usually asked to confirm it.
Restoring single files for individual users should be very much a special case
and not a routine service; otherwise you risk being snowed under with file
recovery requests.
Jonathan
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list