Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC
proposal)
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Mar 30 00:32:47 PDT 2009
In message <20090329180745.GB38985 at server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>, Peter Jeremy write
s:
>>I'm assuming folks are still in love with the TSC because it still the
>>cheapest as oppose ACPI-fast or HPET to even contemplate this?
>
>That is its major advantage. It might be feasible to export all the
>data necessary to implement the complete CLOCK_*_FAST family.
The general attraction is that it can be read from userland by unpriviledged
programs.
On systems where the ACPI or HPET hardware can be memory-mapped, I should
be equally possible to map those read-only into userland processes.
Now _THAT_ would be interesting.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list