binary compatibility query
Mike Meyer
mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df at mired.org
Sat May 10 19:26:53 UTC 2008
On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson <rwatson at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
> > anything exotic then you will "probably" be safe.
> For "raw" UNIX applications, this rule of thumb works well, but not for
> applications that depend on third-party libraries, languages, or daemons.
You can lose the dependency on third party libraries by compiling your
application to a static binary. That will also help with the few
breakages that occur with the system libraries, and with compatibility
across major releases using the backwards compatX packages.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm at mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list