Small change to top

[Robert Watson]

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

> top doesn't get TIME right for threaded processes.  How about this small 
> change:

Could you file a PR for this so that it doesn't get lost?

Thanks!

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge

>
> --- usr.bin/top/machine.c-orig	2008-06-12 23:06:08.000000000 -0500
> +++ usr.bin/top/machine.c	2008-06-12 23:06:51.000000000 -0500
> @@ -725,6 +725,7 @@
> 			prev_pp = pp;
> 		} else {
> 			prev_pp->ki_pctcpu += pp->ki_pctcpu;
> +			prev_pp->ki_runtime += pp->ki_runtime;
> 		}
> 	}
>
>
> (Sorry if the mail client messes up the patch, but it is so short that it can 
> be easily entered by hand.)
>
> I do realize that this is not foolproof, because it won't measure any threads 
> that have finished.  But it is perhaps a bit better than the current state of 
> affairs, which randomly picks a runtime of one of the threads.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>