OT: C++ Template Functions
Erich Dollansky
oceanare at pacific.net.sg
Thu Dec 27 07:43:06 PST 2007
Hi,
Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
>
> The problem is most probably related to the fact that the group of member
> functions is only discriminated by return type (i.e., the template parameter
> defines the return type), not by parameter (which could be inferred).
if nothing got changed over the last years, it is not possible to do
this by definition.
When I needed this the last time, I used a enum as an additonal
parameter to achieve this.
I know, it is not perfect, but it leads to what I intended.
It should work here too. I know, it is not the prefect solution.
Erich
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list