system randomly freezes

Gergely CZUCZY phoemix at harmless.hu
Sat Nov 11 19:25:42 UTC 2006


On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:17:33PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 08:13:22PM +0100, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:02:46PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:57:47PM +0100, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > OK, seems weird to go through all the disruption of changing to a new
> > > > > OS instead of a few minutes work at a console to give us what we need
> > > > > to resolve the matter -- but whatever works for you.
> > > > already done some stuff like these movings... i'm familiars with them.
> > > > it's not about a few minutes work. it's about the few hours' downtime :)
> > > 
> > > It's a few minutes to perform the additional work at the serial
> > > console when your system hangs, which is *required* for a developer to
> > > help with your problem.  If you're not willing to do this, there's not
> > > much more we can do for you.
> > i will see what can i do. a serial console may be accessable, but i'm not sure.
> > i will have to visit the server hotel and talk with the techies there. we
> > have two boxes there, and it may be somehow possible to connect their
> > serial ports. the problem is, they are far away in the room from each other.
> > the hotel only gives system console(VGA+ps2 keyboard) access if i ask. but
> > this bloody box sometimes ain't even responses to that anyways, the LCD
> > remains blank.
> 
> You can't even break to the debugger?
well, no.
currently the serial line is not configured nor connected, and the system console
is not accessable.

> > i'd like to solve this, but the technical opportunities are limited here.
> > we cannot have downtime, and if we have it have to be minimized. as you see
> > clients won't accept a reasons like "sorry, we were debugging this OS we
> > run at the server".
> > 
> > the question will be that, when i have a serial link, and shit happens(tm),
> > should i inspect it myself, or should i scream somewhere for a more decent
> > person (maybe a developer) to check it?
> 
> Did you read the developers handbook chapter I pointed you to, yet?
may be. a while back i've read the developers' handbook. but yet, i
haven't read that chapter, currently, i'm in a work, and have little time
to share.

> > > After 6.2 is release will of course be too late for you, again.  If
> > > the problem is not fixed by magic then you'll be in the same position
> > > you are now.
> > why too late? it usually go for a month with a reboot. and it should be
> > released in a month. as i see, it fits into the time :)
> 
> Because (if it is a FreeBSD bug) then you'll have more work to do to
> apply a patch to your system, and also it won't help anyone else who
> might also be seeing the problem, until 6.3-RELEASE in ~6 months.
probably you won't see this bug for a few weeks. it happens in 4-6 weeks'
time usually. and till that, 6.2 comes out. And we will anyway update to
6.2-RELEASE after it come out. As i had stated, it's not an everyday issue,
it just happens from time-to-time, irregularly, inpredictable.

Bye,

Gergely Czuczy
mailto: gergely.czuczy at harmless.hu

-- 
Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 2547 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20061111/5f52fdf0/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list