world's toolchain & CPUTYPE

Alex Semenyaka flist at snark.rinet.ru
Tue Feb 28 18:59:31 PST 2006


On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:19:11AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Isn't is reasonable to add corresponding optional functionality
> > into the buld process?
> No.

Why? :)

> > For example, if -DSTATIC_TOOLCHAIN (or
> > pick any other name) is set, then:
> > 1) build toolchain statically linked
> This is already the case (${XMAKE} has -DNO_SHARED).

Oh, great. Could we also add -DNO_MAKE_CONF then?
Or at least -DTOOLCHAIN_NO_MAKE_CONF :)
That's would be enough. Or do I miss something?

							SY, Alex



More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list