BGP & reverse dns

Steve Suhre tech at nano.net
Thu Sep 22 14:47:38 PDT 2005


Thanks, I think they figured it out. The customer is always 
right....sigh....

I used the list because I needed to know if there was a quick fix here, 
I added them to a spamassassin whitelist.



Clifton Royston wrote:

>On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:00:47PM +0000, freebsd-hackers-request at freebsd.org wrote:
>  
>
>>Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:51:49 -0600
>>From: Steve Suhre <tech at nano.net>
>>Subject: BGP & reverse dns
>>To: freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org
>>Message-ID: <43318195.8000304 at nano.net>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>>I have a client who's using BGP on their own network but use our mail 
>>servers. They're having trouble sending mail because the server here 
>>can't resolve the IP address back to their network. And if I run the IP 
>>through DNSStuff.com it returns an infinite loop error. They claim they 
>>aren't having trouble anywhere else though....
>>
>>I don't want to turn off reverse lookups, is there anyway to get around 
>>this? Or a simple fix on their end? I know nothing about BGP routing... 
>>We're running sendmail, and spammassassin through procmail. The mail 
>>problem started recently when we upgraded sendmail and added 
>>spamassassin, but their DNS/BGP problems have been there for a while....
>>    
>>
>
>  This question belongs on a different list; I'd normally say
>freebsd-questions, but it has nothing to do with FreeBSD at all as far
>as I can see.  Try inet-access or some similar mailing list which deals
>with Internet access and configuration issues.
>
>  To save a little list bandwidth and give you a starting point for
>that list, my tip is forget about BGP unless it's proved that there is
>a routing problem.  The routing protocol your client is running (BGP)
>has nothing to do with DNS; these operate on completely different
>network layers.  Useful tools for resolving DNS problems are "dig",
>"host", and "whois"; these will let you tell what name server is
>responsible and whether there is a problem with their name servers.
>
>  The immediate question to look into would be who delegated their
>address space to them, and what name server is responsible for its
>rDNS.
>  -- Clifton
>
>  
>


-- 



Steve Suhre
tech at nano.net
719.439.6052 Cell
719.632.2897 Home



More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list