So, who makes this one run FreeBSD? ;-)

[Kamal R. Prasad]

--- Scott Long <scottl at samsco.org> wrote:
[snip]
> 
> An MMU-less port of any BSD would be very
> worthwhile, even if it
> requires a radical divergence from the original
> codebase.  I was

woudn''t it be rather inefficient (in the BEST case)
-handling numerous memory contextx -1 per process? 

> hoping that such a treat would appear out of NetBSD,
> but that doesn't
> seem to be the case.
> 
> Scott

They have taken a conscious decision not to work in
that direction -as it would screw up their overall s/w
architecture in accomodating that port [if they do
manage to get a non-mmu port ready].

regards
-kamal

> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
>
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
Kamal R. Prasad
UNIX systems consultant 
kamalp at acm.org

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is:-).
------------------------------------------------------------


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo