FreeBSD 5.3/4 vs 4.11

ray at redshift.com ray at redshift.com
Mon Jun 13 11:19:17 GMT 2005


yeah, thanks.  I'm subscribed to performance also - it's kinda dead over there.

I'll check the archives also, thanks.

Ray


At 11:42 AM 6/13/2005 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
| ray at redshift.com wrote:
| > Hello list,
| > 
| >   I've recently been doing quite a few benchmarks with regard to PHP and
Apache,
| > as well as stripping down the Kernel on 5.3 and 5.4 to improve performance for
| > web/application servers.  
| > 
| > My question is: I was wondering if anyone out there has ever done a head to
head
| > test of 4.11 to 5.3 (or 5.4) and if so, is 4.11 faster in any areas and/or does
| > it provide any benefits over 5.3+?
| 
| There was a discussion of performance just recently on one if the
| main lists (ie current or hackers or stable, can't remember) However
| you'll find it by browsing the the mail archives via
| http://www.freebsd.org.
| 
| FreeBSD has a mail list dedicated to discussing performance issues.
| I suggest you subscribe it, after first browsing those archives:
| http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/
| 
| -
| Julian Stacey        Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich       http://berklix.com
| Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam).  Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
| 
| 


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list