ttyd0/cuad0 - why is there still this duality ?
M. Warner Losh
imp at bsdimp.com
Mon Jan 24 19:10:43 PST 2005
In message: <20050124124250.A27718 at pix.net>
"Kurt J. Lidl" <lidl at pix.net> writes:
: Having seperate dialout and dialin devices really are just a kludge
: for having the kernel doing locking that could be done in userland
: code.
That's not why they are there.
: Just because FreeBSD does this the same way it's been done on
: BSD-ish systems for the last 15 years doesn't mean there isn't a
: better way of doing it.
That's uncalled for.
The real reason that they are there is that ttyd waits for carrier
detect, while cua doesn't.
Warner
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list