Opening and wriiting to file in Kern
Kamal R. Prasad
kamalpr at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 6 05:39:58 PST 2005
--- Peter Pentchev <roam at ringlet.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 04:22:41AM -0800, Kamal R.
> Prasad wrote:
> >
> > --- Scott Long <scottl at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Ashwin Chandra wrote:
[snip]
> > facility. I don't see anything wrong with
> providing a
> > stream (like) interface to the filesystem.
>
> While there might indeed be nothing wrong with it,
> besides added
> complexity, the traditional way to do it would be to
> have a userland
> configuration utility that communicates with the
> kernel module either
> via ioctl's on some standard device, or via ioctl's
> or reading/writing
> of a driver-specific device. This has the advantage
> of being a bit more
> portable - while different OS's implement disk/file
> I/O within the
> kernel in wildly different ways, all OS's provide
> relatively simple ways
> for a kernel module to define a new device and
> handle ioctl's to it, and
> all OS's provide basically the same
> userland-to-kernel interface for
> having a program open a device and issue ioctl's to
> it :)
>
No doubt about the portability aspect. But there are
situations wherein the kernel does *NOT* want userland
to know that it is using the filesystem for providing
some functionaality. For a device, it is indeed
typical for a userland program to accompany the
driver. But besides that, there are definately
situations (1 of which I am dealing with) wherein
there is no userland code to help one out.
[snip]
regards
-kamal
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list