ADI AD1980 6-channel audio

[Martin Hudec]

Hello Mark,

	For me, I use 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5 as desktop system for a month now, 
I haven't seen any spontaneous reboots or hangs, I just rebooted only when
I had to build new world/kernel, and I never got into any problems (yes with 
-CURRENT it is another story :)) but that is my subjective point of view, I 
didn't test it on any production server to this time.. There are many 
advantages over 4.X branche, just to name few: UFS2, native ACLs support, usb 
support, yes bluetooth support, new hardware support, schedulers etc etc.. 
If there were really way too many problems as you say with 5.X, it wouldn't 
have been released as 5.X-RELEASE, would it? Those way too many problems in 
-question list are in great part reported from people which came straight to 
5.X branch, without any experience with current production branch of 4.X. As 
others have mentioned in replies to your mail, do not put so much trust into 
what others say, but put more trust in what you have experienced, or in what 
you know..

	That's my 10c to discussion.


	Cheers,

	Martin

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 03:01:59AM +0000 or thereabouts, Mark wrote:
> Tim Robbins wrote:
> 
> Because I do not trust 5.x yet. There are way, way too many problems
> reported with it, daily, on the freebsd-questions list, for me to touch it
> with the proverbial ten-foot pole. :) Now, if a 4.9 release came out for
> amd64, that would be a different story, of course. I suspect the 32-bit
> kernel will run nicely on the AMD 64 too, though.
> 
> I would have loved to have had SATA support for the VIA chipset (not yet in
> 4.9R). And if 5.x ever becomes stable (as stable as, say, my old 4.7R, which
> in several years has never spontaneously reset/hung (!)), I will gladly
> upgrade.
> 
> But thanks for the encouraging glimps into the future, anyway. :)

-- 
Martin Hudec		| corwin at aeternal.net
			| corwin at web.markiza.sk
http://www.aeternal.net	| cell +421 907 303 393