implications of SMP kernel on UP
Claudiu Dragalina-Paraipan
clau at reversedhell.net
Thu Apr 1 04:22:08 PST 2004
hello,
what about SMP enabled kernel on Intel P4 with HT technology ?
I have one but I didn't had the chance to test it yet.
Colin Percival wrote:
> At 08:10 01/04/2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>>what are the implications on running an SMP enabled kernel on a UP
>>machine ?
>>
>>I first thought of things like:
>>- performence (most likely not worth the discussion ?)
>
>
> At least in 5.2-RELEASE, there is a significant performance
> delta; buildworld takes about 5% longer on an SMP kernel (and
> the time spent in the kernel is 20% longer).
> I know some optimizations were done shortly after 5.2, so I
> wouldn't be surprised if this situation has improved.
>
> Colin Percival
>
With respect,
--
Claudiu Dragalina-Paraipan
Reversed Hell Networks / reversedhell.net
e-mail: clau at reversedhell.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20040401/4f6c39ba/signature.bin
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list