Status of unionfs in -STABLE

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:54:59PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> Recently I've began to consider making some use of unionfs in
> (semi-)production environment.  Can someone aware of its current status
> in -STABLE comment a bit on this subject?
> 
> Probably any information would be appreciated.

Unchanged since the other times this topic has been discussed recently
- see the archives for extensive discussion.  (Summary: it's possible
to avoid panicking if you carefully restrict the activities you do
with unionfs, but expect panics and possible filesystem corruption
while discovering those limits).

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20031109/5cc1bed1/attachment.bin