Preliminary gbde performance patchset

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

How cute.

Our favourite troll has given us a link which redirects to an url
which he thinks will send a message to SCO:

http://www.sco.com/company/feedback/thanks.html?location=206&category=10&Email=suckthisbitch@fuckyou.com&subject=FUCK_YOU_ASSHOLES!!!&message=SCOsuckmydick!!

Unfortunately, his skills are not up to the task, so it does not work
at all.

Poor troll.

I hope we can get the social services or a mental institution near his
home to take care of him, he _really_ need to take his medication every
day.

Poul-Henning

In message <20030530073702.3DF7F64A37 at smtp.us2.messagingengine.com>, "Jason Str
yker" writes:
>Hello hackers,
>
>I've finished testing my first set of performance patches for gdbe. After
>some testing
>it seems to work ok. The performance gain is about 15% on i386 and
>sparc64. Other systems
>haven't been tested yet, but I encourage all of you to test and give
>feedback. There's a
>weird bug in SMP systems that I haven't been able to fully track down.
>Sometimes gbde will
>fail to attach on systems with more than 1 CPU. Fortunately, it's
>harmless.
>
>Fetch the patch from here: http://tinyurl.com/cx5f
>
>The patch should apply cleanly on any recent -CURRENT. Sorry, it won't
>work on 5.0-R
>It's my first patch against the kernel code, so expect a few
>non-BDE-complying mistakes. Sorry
>for that.
>
>Thanks,
>       Jason
>-- 
>  Jason Stryker
>  jstryker at petml.com
>
>-- 
>http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail
>

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.