Some specific questions about 5.x
Miguel Mendez
flynn at energyhq.homeip.net
Wed Mar 26 09:42:08 PST 2003
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 01:35:37 -0800
Lev Walkin <vlm at netli.com> wrote:
Hi,
> What about Solaris' migration towards 1:1 model from the N:M one they
> had supported for years already? Who are insane, Solaris folks (moving
> towards Linux) or Free/NetBSD ones (migrating to the old Solaris'
> behavior)?
I haven't done Solaris development for a while, but iirc, Sun's
statement on the matter is that developers have to consider which
paradigm fits their application best. Solaris supports both schemes, 1:1
and N:M. Certain applications benefit from the former, other from the
latter. I don't they're going to drop N:M anytime soon. I think the
reason why Linux does 1:1 is that it started as a hack of the process
creation code. Implementing a real N:M system is more complicated.
Perhaps it should be interesting to study in which cases a 1:1 threading
system is better.
Cheers,
--
Miguel Mendez - flynn at energyhq.homeip.net
GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt
EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk
Tired of Spam? -> http://www.trustic.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20030326/6b1364aa/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list