Cannot auto-mount digital camera
Lachlan Michael
lachlan at lkla.org
Sat Apr 12 13:02:39 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 20:16 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> The camera may be getting unique handling. Gvfs is built with gphoto2
> support by default. When that is enabled, certain cameras will be
> available to gphoto, but perhaps not mountable. Try rebuilding gvfs
> without gphoto support, and see if that helps.
It didn't help ... the same result. (I also rebuilt all ports depending
of gvfs)
In the halfaq it states
> Understand that having hal alone does not mean media will get
> automatically mounted. Hal simply serves as a broker for requests to
> mount certain devices. Some other software needs to make this
> request. As of GNOME 2.22, this is Nautilus.
Since there is no problem with manual mounting or FreeBSD "seeing" the
devices, I guess the problem is with Nautilus.
Is there some other debug output I can look at see what is going wrong?
(Nautilus options or something?) Could this be a symptom of
gnome-volume-manager trying to mount the camera instead of nautilus?
I also collected all the information again in case there is some
difference in the output. Please see
http://lachlan.lkla.org/tmp/Camera_2.22_Try2/
for details.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20080412/8fc4ef43/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list