CFT: New hal patchset
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at FreeBSD.org
Mon Apr 7 04:50:36 UTC 2008
I'm looking for people to test this small patchset for hal to look for
adverse effects. Ideally, these patches should be a big no-op for the
majority of users, but I want to make sure there are no regressions.
If you are going to test, first save the output of lshal to have a
control with which to compare. Then, apply the following diff to
sysutils/hal:
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal
# patch -p < /path/to/hal.diff
# portupgrade -fOW hal
If you do notice a problem, please provide a clear problem description
and the before and after lshal outputs.
Some users may notice an improvement in the following areas:
* Discs formatted with non-ISO, non-UDF file systems are properly
detected
* Certain unsliced file systems (e.g. FAT, NTFS, etc.) are properly
detected (and mounted)
I'm not interested in general hal problems (though those _should_ be
reported). I just want confirmation that this patchset does not
introduce _new_ problems. Thanks.
http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/hal.diff
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome at FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20080407/69e6b3ab/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list