HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20.1 available for FreeBSD
tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org
tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org
Thu Oct 25 12:42:38 PDT 2007
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:45:44AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 00:37 -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
>> > > <snip>
>> > > You will have to talk to the mono maintainer as we didn't touch
>> > > lang/mono port at all.
>> >
>> > Not to be pushy but since gnome is one the most commonly installed
>> ports
>> > and mono is a required component shouldn't the responibility to make
>> > sure that all dependancies (even ones that are not your problem
>> > directly) build correctly?
I keep two personal machines at home for FreeBSD work. One running 7 and
one running 6 (currently down due to disk failure) and both have a
tinderbox along with multiple jails on them. RELENG_7 only branched
recently so I haven't even had much time to setup a FreeBSD 8 system. I'm
not sure I will even have a FreeBSD 8 system anytime soon. I have no more
free PCs at home and already need to purchase a new Linux box which I keep
as a reference machine. I can scrap the FreeBSD 6 box and load FreeBSD 8
which I have thought about but that has its own issues. Do I drop testing
on what will become a legacy branch soon even though it is still widely
used? Mono's issues on FreeBSD have historically been thread related so
do I want to drop the last branch with libpthread?
If something breaks on a development branch it will get fixed but
typically at a slower rate. My personal opinion is my resources are
better spent making sure ports work on production branches rather than a
development branch. People should expect breakage in a development
branch. They should be able to expect things work and have been
reasonably tested when using a production branch.
>> We did a lot to verify GNOME builds correctly. Our tests were done
>> mainly on 6.X and 7.X (as 8.X is still a fairly new version). Since
>> you're running bleeding edge code, you may run into problems. You need
>> to report problems to the proper maintainers, and be patient.
>
> Mono has an 8.x problem as well. I sent this patch to the maintainer
> yesterday. It works for me, but I haven't heard back. Folks running
> mono on -CURRENT are welcome to try it.
>
>
> --
> Ted Faber
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP:
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
> Unexpected attachment on this mail? See
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
>
Just committed the fix. Thanks Ted.
tom
--
| tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org |
| FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org |
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list