[kde-freebsd] Re: WITH_ARTS vs. WITH_ESD

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Wednesday, 14. September 2005 08:25, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > > It would seem, that instructing esound to build with arts support
> > > and arts to support esound results in circular dependency.
> > >
> > > Can someone, please, test this? Add WITH_ESD and WITH_ARTS to your
> > > /etc/make.conf and try to make either of them on a system, where
> > > neither is already installed.
> >
> > I've removed arts support from esound.  I don't really see the need.

Erm. This is shooting with cannons on user's feet. Please don't?

> Thanks, but that did not really answer my question... This is not the
> last circular dependency and we better be prepared to handle it.

Any ideas how?

The only thing I can think of is doing

-.if defined(WITH_ESD)
+.if defined(WITH_ESD) && !defined(WITH_ARTS)

, but given that you're the first person to ever notice this little loop (I 
suppose you discovered it while working on the all-depends-list target?), 
it's probably more than enough.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20050914/cbee0a6d/attachment.bin