Gstreamer-plugins splitting ports .. needs testing and feed back ?

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 21:14, Michael Johnson wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2004, at 8:45 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> 
> > There's a lot here, and I certainly haven't been through it all.
> > Besides my earlier request to allow for a way to build all of
> > gstreamer-plugins in a monolithic way (like we can now) for testing
> > purposes, I would add that you should include bsd.gstreamer.mk twice in
> > bsd.port.mk (once during the bsd.port.pre.mk, and once during post).
> > This way it will work with things like OPTIONS.
> >
> > Joe
> 
> I added the second include bsd.gstreamer.mk to bsd.port.mk not too long 
> ago.
> 
> When you say we need to be able to build gstreamer-plugins in a 
> monolithic way,
> Would it be better to add a port say gstreamer-plugins-all, a kind of 
> metaport, not really monolithic but it
> may work for what we want/need.
> 
> Or add a "all" to bsd.gstreamer.mk which will build all plugins if 
> USE_GSTREAMER=all is defined
>    this may be useful for some ports.
> 
> Or add a knob in gstreamer-plugins to build every plugin ?

I think it would be good to have a knob in gstreamer-plugins that would
build every plug-in for purposes of upgrade testing.

Joe

> 
> 
> Michael
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20041006/62464aa4/attachment.bin