Upgrading -CURRENT and will downgrade GNOME to 2.6...

[Adam Weinberger]

>> (08.14.2004 @ 1343 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 1.4K: <<
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:37:11 -0400, Adam Weinberger <adamw at FreeBSD.org>  
> wrote:
> 
> >>>(08.14.2004 @ 1310 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 1.0K: <<
> >>When I am done with the ruby-gtk2/gnome2 update, then do you want me to
> >>test with gnome_upgrade.sh for GNOME 2.6 -> 2.7.x? Unless, it's already
> >>well tested by adamw and/or whomever. If nobody reply on this part,  
> >>then I
> >>will do the 'rm -rf /usr/local/* /usr/X11R6/* /compat/linux/*
> >>/var/db/pkg/*' and do the clean install instead gnome_upgrade.sh,  
> >>because
> >>it is faster than portupgrade when do the big upgrade.
> >>>end of "Upgrading -CURRENT and will downgrade GNOME to 2.6..." from  
> >>>Jeremy Messenger <<
> >
> >I run full gnome_upgrade.sh upgrades every 2 or 3 days or so,
> >alternating between 4.x and 5.x.
> 
> Isn't it why your machine has died from that? Poor your dear machine. ;-)

Hehehehehe! I do those runs on the jails that Joe set up for me.

> >Unless there are errors, I run in the following order:
> >* clean 2.6 install
> >* clean 2.7 install
> >* clean 2.7-experimental install
> >* 2.6 -> 2.7 upgrade run
> >on 5-CURRENT and then 4-STABLE.
> 
> package or ports or both? If you haven't test with package, then I can do  
> it here at the same time test by run desktop to see if it functions fine.

Only ports.

# Adam


--
Adam Weinberger
adamw at magnesium.net || adamw at FreeBSD.org
adamw at vectors.cx    ||   adamw at gnome.org
http://www.vectors.cx