need your opinion/vote for name of gdesklets...

[Jeremy Messenger]

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:04:06 +0100, Alexander Leidinger 
<Alexander at Leidinger.net> wrote:

> On 19 Nov 2003 16:25:05 -0500
> Adam Weinberger <adamw at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> > 1)
>> > gdesklets-<name>-sensor
>> > gdesklets-<name>-display
>> >
>> > 2)
>> > gdesklets-sensor-<name>
>> > gdesklets-display-<name>
>> >
>> > Which is better? 1 or 2? Vote....
>
>
>> I like 2 better. That way, I can easily search for gdesklets sensors by
>> doing locate gdesklets-sensor-.
>
> That's a very good reason...

I agree, #2 is already a winner.

> What's the gdesklet syntax for referring to sensors/displays? Do we want
> to change it if it isn't 2)?

I am not sure, but I prefer to add 'gdesklets-' for ease to search. In 
gentoo, they do desklet-<name>display and desklet-<name>sensor, no space 
between. In Debian, they put all stuff together in a package and name it 
as gdesklets-data.

I personal think I will go for #2 above.

Cheers,
Mezz

> Bye,
> Alexander.


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.