xscreensaver

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 05:23, Sean McNeil wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Is there a security issue with xscreensaver configured to use PAM or
> kerberos?  Both xscreensaver and xscreensaver-gnome ports are configured
> without PAM/kerberos.  I know without PAM it won't work properly on a
> system configured to use LDAP for accounts.  I'm having that trouble
> right now.
> 
> I took the --without-pam and --without-kerberos out and PAM/LDAP stuff
> now work great for me.

I think we wanted to make xscreensaver as basic as possible.  But
perhaps these features were disabled for legacy reasons.  I think we
could reactivate them as conditionals in the future.

Joe

> 
> Sean
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-gnome at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20031201/bba9e056/attachment.bin