gdk-pixbuf has indirect gettext dependency

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 10:20, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 02:37:01AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 22:43, Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> > > Howdy,
> > >
> > > I was doing the gettext dance on one of my systems today, and
> > > discovered that gdk-pixbuf has an indirect dependency on gettext,
> > > seemingly inherited through gtk. So the following procedure:
> > >
> > > install a bunch of stuff gettext is updated, and bumps .so version
> > > number uninstall gettext, glib, gtk reinstall above try to run any
> > > app linked with gdk-pixbuf *BOOM*
> >
> > This is why I recommended people do a portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=yes
> > gettext so that they can get to all the ports with implicit
> > dependencies on gettext.
> 
> Just a note, I did the 'portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=yes gettext' job
> yesterday (took almost all day).  Anyway, the '-m BATCH=yes' part did
> not work.  I still got the (annoying) confirmation screen for gdm2.  Of
> course I realized this when I got back to the machine after being out
> for a while.

The order is important.  I had a typo in my original email that said
portupgrade -rf gettext -m BATCH=yes.  That will not work.  portupgrade
-rf -m BATCH=yes gettext did work correctly for me.

Joe

-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20030831/55bdcccd/attachment.bin