Strange commit

[Ed Maste]

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 22:06, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, 1:33 PM Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 05:20, Ulrich Spörlein <uspoerlein at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > This is intentional, please see https://github.com/freebsd/svn2git/blob/1a0b3e0230e1b2430e5d8eb91ac99aeff5a1614d/src/svn.cpp#L883
>> >
>> > Only projects and user branches are represented as merges to master, as they usually have a full tree. This seemed to match the git model better (as opposed to the SVN model).
>>
>> IMO we do want vendor code updates recorded as merges. This is already
>> happening today for certain updates (svn merge -c <rev> updates I
>> believe). For example my most recent ELF Tool Chain vendor update:
>> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/ca8624403626d5a4e13f5006026ca6ba40c12ac5
>
> How do we both do subtree to not not have the vendor repos commingled inbour tree and do this?

I'm not sure I understand what you mean here, but there's no problem
for us to have the original snapshotted history just as we do with
merges from svn vendor branches today.