geom 'taste' vs. manual creation ?

[Ivan Voras]

Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> geom(4) says:
> 
>    A geom which came into being as a result of a normal taste operation
>    should self-destruct...
> 
> Now I wonder:
> does the GEOM infrastructure record whether a geom has been created
> by a 'taste' call, or manually through a 'geom xxx create ..', or
> this info should be managed directly by the individual implementation ?

I'm not sure if this is what you're asking, but when a new geom is
created (for example by a complex / transformation GEOM class...), it is
automatically tested again, so why would it be different now?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/attachments/20090113/02a36022/signature.pgp