High fragmentation on zpool log
InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter
jg at internetx.com
Fri Nov 27 16:22:01 UTC 2015
Am 27.11.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Kai Gallasch:
> On 27.11.2015 16:49 InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
>> Your SSDS are not really attached as Zil ?
>
> Sorry. Due to copying&pasting a condensed version of zpool list -v, I
> forgot to paste a line.. so this is the corrected version:
>
> Sorry,
> Kai.
>
:)
i think this is caused by the size of your Zil, dunno if its really
something to care about ( i whould not worry about). More problematic
(regarding SSD Lifetime) is the dual use of SSD for ZIL / L2. Your Flash
Drives get hammered with writes from 2 Sides. Write Caching, and L2 Feed
ing.
>
> (zpool list -v output, ommited columns: EXPANDSZ.,DEDUP,
> HEALTH, ALTROOT)
>
> NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE FRAG CAP
> rpool 7.25T 440G 6.82T 4% 5%
> mirror 1.81T 110G 1.71T 4% 5%
> gpt/rpool-WMC160D0SVZE - - - - -
> gpt/rpool-WMC160D8MJPD - - - - -
> mirror 1.81T 110G 1.70T 4% 5%
> gpt/rpool-WMC160D9DLL2 - - - - -
> gpt/rpool-WMC160D23CWA - - - - -
> mirror 1.81T 110G 1.71T 4% 5%
> gpt/rpool-WMC160D94930 - - - - -
> gpt/rpool-WMC160D9V5LW - - - - -
> mirror 1.81T 110G 1.71T 4% 5%
> gpt/rpool-WMC160D9ZV0S - - - - -
> gpt/rpool-WMC160D5HFT6 - - - - -
> logs
> mirror 7.94G 43.2M 7.90G 85% 0%
> gpt/log-BTTV523401U4100FGN - - - - -
> gpt/log-BTTV5234003K100FGN - - - - -
> cache - - - - -
> gpt/cache-BTTV5234003K100FGN 85.2G 142G 16.0E 0% 166%
> gpt/cache-BTTV523401U4100FGN 85.2G 172G 16.0E 0% 202%
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list