FreeBSD support being added to GlusterFS

Baptiste Daroussin bapt at freebsd.org
Sat Jun 28 11:17:53 UTC 2014


On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 04:07:38AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote:
> > it is not necessary on an official release which comprises of "./configure" .
> >
> >
> 
> In-fact argp from ports is okay to use, but it would be less work to
> rely on argp-standalone
> provided by GlusterFS. If the reason to use 'argp' from port was
> related to ./autogen.sh -
> then in-fact its not necessary.
> 
> As i explained earlier - it was our mistake to provide only 'git'
> tarball not the 'make dist' tarball.
> I have further changes pending on review upstream, once they are
> pushed - i will provide a new
> tarball - without the necessity for './autogen.sh'
> 
> Thanks for testing this port.

Thank you in general we try to unbundle as much thing as possible that said argp
is small and safe enough to not cause problems having it bundled :)

So I have no strong opinion on that.

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/attachments/20140628/3d6c8968/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list