Performance difference between UFS and ZFS with NFS

[krad]

I was thinking the same, if it was using /dev/zero as an input any
compression would skew the results a little.


On 24 November 2013 15:15, Steven Hartland <killing at multiplay.co.uk> wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Browning"
>
>
>
>  On a side note I forgot that I had used dd to test the disk performance a
>> while ago when I was using ZFS.
>>
>> ZFS performance:
>> 3072000000 bytes transferred in 34.167480 secs (89910055 bytes/sec)
>> 34.17s real 0.61s user 31.89s sys
>>
>> UFS performance:
>> 3072000000 bytes transferred in 11.848883 secs (259264942 bytes/sec)
>> 11.85s real 0.58s user 11.25s sys
>>
>> Again, even with dd performance is about 3x faster with UFS with the same
>> disks.
>>
>
> Interesting, what was you command exactly?
>
>    Regards
>    Steve
>
> ================================================
> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and
> the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection,
> the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise
> disseminating it or any information contained in it.
> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please
> telephone +44 845 868 1337
> or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>