Changes to kern.geom.debugflags?
Chris Ross
cross+freebsd at distal.com
Mon Feb 11 03:16:23 UTC 2013
On Jan 17, 2013, at 19:49 , Chris Ross <cross+freebsd at distal.com> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:35 , Andriy Gapon <avg at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> thank you for triaging and analyzing this problem. And sorry for the long delay
>> (caused by the New Year craziness you mentioned earlier).
>>
>> The problem is that arch_zfs_probe methods are expected only to probe for ZFS
>> disks/partitions, but they are not allowed to execute any other ZFS operations.
>> I assumed this to be true and forgot to check sparc64_zfs_probe. Mea culpa.
>>
>> Could you please test the following patch?
>
> Thank you, Andriy. Much as you'd expect, that patch solves the problem. I get some
> of the printf()s that I'd put into zfs_fmtdev(), and the system loads successfully.
>
> Please commit that patch, and if you could, change the comment just below the last
> portion of it that is now not quite accurate (since you moved mentioned code).
>
> Thanks again! How long will this take to get to stable/9? Being new to FreeBSD,
> I'm not too familiar with the process of HEAD/stable/etc. (In NetBSD, it would be a
> commit followed by a pull request.)
Sad to say that after hand-testing that patch, I waited for it to appear on stable-9,
(by manual inspection of the relevant code), and tried again. This time, I get a
slightly different failure:
Rebooting with command: boot
Boot device: disk1 File and args:
>> FreeBSD/sparc64 ZFS boot block
Boot path: /pci at 1c,600000/scsi at 2/disk at 1,0:a
ERROR: Last Trap: Memory Address not Aligned
{1} ok
This is with a zfsloader built from stable-9 as of Feb 2. I'm updating and rebuilding
now, just to check, but I wanted to send out a note incase anyone else on the
sparc64 list has also seen this.
- Chris
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list