FFS - Still using rotational delay with modern disks?

[Greg 'groggy' Lehey]

On Monday, 17 December 2012 at 16:44:11 -0500, Dieter BSD wrote:
> The newfs man page says:
>
>  -a maxcontig
>  Specify the maximum number of contiguous blocks that will be laid
>  out before forcing a rotational delay.  The default value is 16.
>  See tunefs(8) for more details on how to set this option.
>
> Is this still a good idea with modern drives where the number of
> sectors per track varies, and no one but the manufacturer knows how
> many sectors a particular track has?

No.

It looks as if this, and also a number of comments in sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h
and sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c, are leftovers from the Olden Days.  The
value isn't used anywhere that I can see.  Unless somebody can show
that I'm wrong, I'd suggest that this is a documentation issue that I
can take a look at.

Greg
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
Finger grog at FreeBSD.org for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed.  If your Microsoft MUA reports
problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/attachments/20121218/1c32225b/attachment.sig>