zfs very poor performance compared to ufs due to lack of cache?
jhell
jhell at DataIX.net
Sun Sep 5 13:58:49 UTC 2010
On 09/05/2010 09:19, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "jhell" <jhell at DataIX.net>
>>>
>>> Attached is the needfree patch mentioned in the URL alongside a local
>>> system patch to adjust kern.maxusers to no more than 512 on systems that
>>> can support it...
>
> No joy, still drops down to arc_min even with those two patches and
> changing
> to vm_paging_needed from the post Artem mentioned:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2010-August/032731.html
>
> So I suspect if I hadn't put in a high arc_min as well it would be back
> down
> at silly low levels.
>
> top shows:-
>
> Mem: 26M Active, 1360M Inact, 2434M Wired, 6188K Cache, 418M Buf, 117M Free
> Swap: 4096M Total, 15M Used, 4081M Free
>
> ARC Size:
> Current Size: 57.14% 2048.00M (arcsize)
> Target Size: (Adaptive) 57.14% 2048.00M (c)
> Min Size (Hard Limit): 57.14% 2048.00M (c_min)
> Max Size (High Water): ~1:1 3584.00M (c_max)
>
> So there's still 1.3G of mem sitting inact, don't know what caused that but
> its essentially dead memory now it seems.
>
> I know I could raise arc_min even further but that could be dangerous?
>
> Any other suggestions? It seems like arc needs to cooperate with the
> rest of the OS pagedaemon more?
I am not exactly sure what your source is right now but guessing its at
least 8.1-RELEASE & hoping its 8.1-STABLE.
Line 3656 & 3657 of arc.c ? what are they ?
Do they look like the following,
3656: uint64_t available_memory = ptoa((uintmax_t)cnt.v_free_count
3657: + cnt.v_cache_count);
Regards,
--
jhell,v
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list