ufs+softupdates / consistency
Arne Wörner
arne_woerner at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 26 20:04:18 PST 2005
--- Xin LI <delphij at frontfree.net> wrote:
> å¨ 2005-01-26ä¸ç 17:42 -0800ï¼Arne WXrneråéï¼
> > Can somebody explain me, why write speed is so much slower
> > than read speed (even with hard disc write cache)?
>
> This is common case caused by physical constraints I guess :-)
> > I tried an UFS1 file system mounted async for another test.
> > And the write speed was still about 5 Mbyte/sec.
>
> Well, I haven't benchmarked it by myself, however, the author of
> SoftUpdates claims that the benchmark should be 95% or so as you
> async mount a UFS file system. BTW: I think 5MB/s of write
> speed is somewhat too slow for an IDE device, you may want to
> check the cable, etc.
>
Hmm. I tried a "dd if=/dev/zero of=a bs=64k count=1000 ; sync"
with KNOPPIX and the same slice/cable and ext3fs (mkfs with
defaults) and it was about 4 times faster than FreeBSD R5.3.
Furthermore the read speed is about 25Mbyte/sec, so that the cable
seems to be ok.
Funnily my other hard disc (SAMSUNG SP1604N), which uses the same
cable, is much faster:
write
(bs=64k count=1000 if=/dev/zero):
appr. 48Mbyte/sec
read
(bs=64k count=3975 if=<another file>):
appr. 38Mbyte/sec (???????????)
I do not understand this different behaviour... *sniff*
-Arne
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list