linux-only jail possible?

[John Nielsen]

On Tuesday 16 March 2010 05:02:21 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting John Nielsen <lists at jnielsen.net> (from Mon, 15 Mar 2010
> 
> 20:46:05 -0400):
> > On Sunday 07 March 2010 05:44:37 am Ed Schouten wrote:
> >> * Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at Leidinger.net> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:15:12 +0100 Ed Schouten <ed at 80386.nl> wrote:
> >> > > I am still in doubt what to do. Maybe we could consider committing
> >> > > a patch like this:
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> > > This is a bit more complete. What it does, is that it creates a
> >> > > symlink from /proc/%d/fd to /dev/fd, only if the calling process
> >> > > matches. Then when you mount fdescfs on /dev/fd, it also does the
> >> > > right thing, because it will always readlink() on a character
> >> > > device, which also returns an error code.
> >> > >
> >> > > Comments, suggestions anyone?
> >> >
> >> > Looks better than the one before. :)
> >>
> >> Great. Just committed it to SVN:
> >>
> >> 	http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=204825
> >
> > I finally tried the patch from SVN today and it does NOT resolve the
> > openpty issue on FreeBSD 8-STABLE amd64 + CentOS 5.4 i386 jail +
> > OpenSSH 4.3p2. I still (or again) get the "fatal: openpty returns
> > device for which ttyname fails." message.
> 
> Just to verify: You have fdeskfs mounted in the linux jail?

Err.. no. Did I miss that requirement? :) I'll give that a go with the SVN 
linproc patch.

JN