[not completely SOLVED] acroread8 does not print any more

[John Baldwin]

On Monday 04 May 2009 4:05:45 pm Rainer Hurling wrote:
> John, thank you for answering.
> 
> On 04.05.2009 16:55 (UTC+2), John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 April 2009 1:56:01 pm Rainer Hurling wrote:
> >> A few days ago I reported about problems when I try to print from 
> >> acroread8. For all but one of my systems the problem is solved now, see 
> >> below.
> >>
> >> On one system I also totally cleaned up the linux emulator part and 
> >> installed everything from the scratch. Now when I try to print I get the 
> >> following message:
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Beim Drucken ist folgender Fehler aufgetreten...
> >> '/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/compat/libc.so.6: version
> >> GLIBC_2.2.4 required by /usr/local/Adobe/Reader8/DEU/
> >> Adobe/Reader8/Reader/intellinux/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 not
> >> defined'
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> libc.so.6 is from misc/compat6x. I am not able to detect any relevant 
> >> differences between my systems.
> > 
> > You need a Linux libc.so.6 in /compat/linux.  You need to install an RPM 
that 
> > contains this into /compat/linux (probably called something 
> > like 'compat-libc').  Probably it would be nice to have a port for this 
(or 
> > include it in the linux base port) for acroread8 to depend on.  I think 
this 
> > is a ports@ issue though.
> > 
> 
> On /compat/linux/lib I have 'libc-2.7.so' and a link 'libc.so.6 -> 
> libc-2.7.so'.
> 
> #pkg_info -W /compat/linux/lib/libc-2.7.so
> /compat/linux/lib/libc-2.7.so was installed by package linux_base-f8-8_11
> 
> But there is another libc.so.6:
> 
> #pkg_info -W /usr/local/lib/compat/libc.so.6
> /usr/local/lib/compat/libc.so.6 was installed by package 
> compat6x-i386-6.4.604000.200810
> 
> I have the CURRENT systems with, as far as I can see, exact the same 
> configuration. On all my other systems printing from acroread8 is ok. 
> Because of that I opened this thread :-(
> 
> I have no idea where to look next,

I wonder if this is the problem of /usr/local/lib/compat being earlier in the 
ld include path than /lib?  Do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set at all?

-- 
John Baldwin