status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ?

Gary Jennejohn gary.jennejohn at freenet.de
Sun Jul 26 07:52:53 UTC 2009


On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:01:57 +0400
Boris Samorodov <bsam at ipt.ru> wrote:

> Rerouting from stable@ to emulation@ as it may be a serious matter.
> 
> Alexander Kabaev <kabaev at gmail.com> writes:
> > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:36:00 +0400
> > Boris Samorodov <bsam at ipt.ru> wrote:
> >> 
> >> As for the original question. I don't use flash so can't be very
> >> helpful here. But there are reports at emulation@ ML that both
> >> linux-f8-flashplugin10 and linux-f10-flashplugin10 work better
> >> then flashplugin[7|9].
> >
> > It does not work very well under Linux32 compat on -current - our futex
> > implementation seems to be too broken and causes frequent deadlock and
> > causes multiple threads to get stuck on process exit. One can easily
> > collect dozens of those stuck processes doing causal web browsing.
> 
> Can anybody comment on this? Thanks!
> 

flashplugin10 works fine for me with AMD64-current as long as I set
compat.linux32.maxssiz=4194304 in /etc/sysctl.conf.

No more hanging processes, no more core dumps.

I also have linux_base-f10-10 installed.

---
Gary Jennejohn


More information about the freebsd-emulation mailing list