[PATCH] Add stubs for Linux 2.6.17 syscalls
Roman Divacky
rdivacky at FreeBSD.org
Thu Apr 17 07:56:45 UTC 2008
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 06:39:48PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 April 2008 06:18 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 05:38 pm, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> > > would a patch like this make linux flash9 work?
> >
> > I wasn't able to make linux-flashplugin9 work with amd64 but I know
> > set_robust_list syscall was used by linux_base-f8 +
> > nspluginwrapper. Can anyone try it on i386 and let us know?
>
> BTW, functionally it does not change anything but it complains
> unimplemeted syscalls are used, i.e., just making them visible. With
> or without it, it should return ENOSYS.
I wonder what would change if we used "vanilla glibc" instead of fedora's
one....
can someone test flash9 with "normal glibc" ie, not one that with 2.6.16
kernel uses 2.6.37 syscalls ;)
roman
More information about the freebsd-emulation
mailing list