CALL FOR TESTERS: linux-f8 infrastructure ports
Boris Samorodov
bsam at ipt.ru
Tue Apr 8 17:36:08 UTC 2008
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:35:05 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:11:37 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam at ipt.ru> (from Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:43:49 +0400):
> > > Which engines you would like to see by default with f8?
> > The one I use? ;-)
> Sure! And it is...
> > I don't know if it should be by default or with an extra port. By
> > default would be more user friendly. Depends on the size maybe. We
> > could have a look what is installed in the native gtk2-engines
> > port(s).
> Well, I just noticed that at a time of the port's (linux-f8-gtk2)
> creation I've overlooked the existence of
> gtk2-engines-2.12.2-1.fc8.i386.rpm package... I'll fix the port.
Done. New version at the same place:
ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/FreeBSD/linux-f8/test-f8.tar.bz2
(BTW from now it's a link to a versioned file, test-f8.2.tar.bz2
for now)
Engines, which are installed (from gtk2-engines-2.12.2-1.fc8.i386.rpm
package):
-----
$ pwd
/usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines
$ ls -1
libclearlooks.so
libcrux-engine.so
libglide.so
libhcengine.so
libindustrial.so
libmist.so
libpixmap.so
libredmond95.so
libsmooth.so
libthinice.so
-----
There are some other engines which exist at Fedora distribution:
-----
gtk-murrine-engine
gtk-nodoka-engine
gtk-qt-engine
gtk-rezlooks-engine
gtk-xfce-engine
-----
Should I include them by default? I'd say yes since they are
light-weight.
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
More information about the freebsd-emulation
mailing list