HEADS-UP: new dummy syscalls for linuxolator -> new console
?messages
Oliver Fromme
olli at lurza.secnetix.de
Wed Jun 14 12:45:55 UTC 2006
Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at leidinger.net> wrote:
> Quoting Divacky Roman <xdivac02 at stud.fit.vutbr.cz> wrote:
> > [...]
> > I doubt anyone will see any messages unless he/she sets
> > compat.linux.osrelease
> > to something higher then 2.6.16
>
> Which is not recommended except you don't mind running into bugs and
> getting coredumps from some programs.
That's interesting to know. Is that documented somewhere?
I always set the sysctls like this (e.g. on FreeBSD 6.1):
compat.linux.osrelease: 6.1
compat.linux.osname: FreeBSD
(I have an rc.d script which uses the output from uname -rs
to set those two sysctls accordingly.)
So far, I have never encountered any problems. I'm doing
that because I use the Linux binary of Opera, and I prefer
the "User-Agent" header to say FreeBSD instead of Linux,
so it will be counted correctly for sites that collect
statistics about the OS of their visitors.
Should I expect to run into problems with that in the
future? If so, I think a warning should be added to the
linux(4) manpage.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing
Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.
"[...] one observation we can make here is that Python makes
an excellent pseudocoding language, with the wonderful attribute
that it can actually be executed." -- Bruce Eckel
More information about the freebsd-emulation
mailing list