I am trying to compile under linux compat
Gábor Kövesdán
gabor at FreeBSD.org
Wed Aug 30 21:38:43 UTC 2006
Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 01:10 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:52:49 -0500 Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 23:37 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:58:03 -0500 Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I didn't install linux-devtools, since everything is supposed to be in
>>>>> fc4 port, right?
>>>>>
>>>> Linux_base port is not supposed to install _everithing_ but to install
>>>> the stuff to support running linux ports under FreeBSD OS.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> There isn't a linux gcc installed, do I need get it from another
>>>>> port?
>>>>>
>>>> You may consider using linux_dist-gentoo* for a development needs.
>>>>
>>> Would I install that over - in conjunction with the fc4?
>>>
>> I think yes, but definitely the maintainer of linux_dist-gentoo* ports
>> (CCed) knows better.
>>
>>
>
> Well, I went ahead and installed it. Unless WITH_LINUXBASE is set, it
> installs into /usr/local/gentoo-stage1. To run progs or compile, you
> have to do a 'chroot /usr/local/gentoo-stage1'. Which is not optimal
> if I want to run something compiled there as in /usr/compat/linux. I
> am going to try to make it the linux_base and see how things run.
> Just curious, if linux_base-fc4 is going to be the default, why not
> make a linux-devtools port that coincides with the linux_base port?
>
>
>
I'd suggest stage3 instead of stage1 since it is the most complete
version. WITH_LINUXBASE is okay, if you don't want to chroot, but that
is discouraged, since _none_ of the related ports are guaranteed to work
properly with that. Only the default linux_base port is supported
officially by our ports collection, which is already linux_base-fc4 at
the moment, that's why I did not mention this way in my previous answer.
--
Cheers,
Gabor
More information about the freebsd-emulation
mailing list