eclipse 3.3.0

[Daniel Rucci]

Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:39:58AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
>> Ken Yamada wrote:
>>>  Opps!
>>>
>>>  You missed ${WRKSRC} in ${CP}.
>>>  It needs to be ;
>>>
>>> do-build:
>>>        @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} \
>>>        ./build -os ${ECLIPSE_OS} -ws ${ECLIPSE_WS} -arch ${ECLIPSE_ARCH}  
>>>        -comp
>>> ilelibs)
>>>        @${CP} 
>>>        ${WRKSRC}/launchertmp/library/${ECLIPSE_WS}/eclipse_1017a.so \
>>>          ${WRKSRC}/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.${ECLIPSE_WS}.${ECLIPSE_OS}.${ECLIPSE_ARCH}_1.0.0.v20070606
>>>
>>>  Yes, it works - better than I thought..., but, we may better tailor 
>>>  build.xml further before committing as a port so that we can port next 
>>>  version easier...
>> Ah yes!  That's what I get for rushing through!
>>
>> http://www.buzmo.com/projects/eclipse-europa-port/Makefile-090907.diff 
>> has said fix included.  (Ironically enough, made manually to the diff 
>> and untested... will I never learn?!?)
>>
>> And you're right on your second point too, it does work very well.
> 
> Sounds like its good enough to at least commit to eclipse-devel?
> 

http://rucci.org/ports/java/eclipse-europa/ contains a 'cleaned up'
version of the port:
 * Included Mikes Makefile diff
 * Removed unused files (or at least most of them?)
 * ran portlint -A as per  the porters-handbook and made some changes to
the Makefile to get rid of the errors, now it just gives the following
warnings:

WARN: Makefile: possible use of absolute pathname "/dev/null".
WARN: Makefile: "LIB_DEPENDS" has to appear earlier.

portlint also suggests that programs such as eclipse should not list
java as its main category, I am not sure if we should follow its
recommendation or stick with the rest of the eclipse related ports. (or
maybe ports/eclipse/* ).


Dan