dtrace: give %'d a chance?

[Ash Gokhale]

Oh, neat. My mistake for not understanding 'd.  Fire away.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 9:20 AM Andriy Gapon <avg at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 19/11/2020 15:31, Ash Gokhale wrote:
> > I'm not a fan of reading nanosecond timestamps ; however This would add
> work to
> > downstream scripts  that have to toss the prettyprint later;
> > s|.,()<whatever>||g  downstream. Think of the wee awk scripts.
> > Could we gate the behaviour behind an environment DTRACE_LOCALE or
> whatever?
> >
> > Eh It's getting harder to live in the C locale anyway, the immigration
> rules
> > seem to be tightening.
>
> Sorry, but you don't have to use %'d.
> You can keep using %d.
>
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:29 AM Andriy Gapon <avg at freebsd.org
> > <mailto:avg at freebsd.org>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     what do people think about adding
> >         setlocale(LC_NUMERIC, "");
> >     to dtrace's main function?
> >
> >     My primary interest is to (pretty-)print some numbers with a
> thousands
> >     separator.
> >
> >     Not sure if any other LC_ types are worth bothering.
> >
> >     --
> >     Andriy Gapon
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     freebsd-dtrace at freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-dtrace at freebsd.org>
> mailing list
> >     https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-dtrace
> >     To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-dtrace-unsubscribe at freebsd.org
> >     <mailto:freebsd-dtrace-unsubscribe at freebsd.org>"
> >
>
>
> --
> Andriy Gapon
>