removing solaris cyclic

George Neville-Neil gnn at neville-neil.com
Thu Oct 9 15:35:23 UTC 2014


On 9 Oct 2014, at 4:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:

> I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following branch for a
> phased removal of solaris cyclic code:
> https://github.com/avg-I/freebsd/compare/review/no-cyclic
> Raw diff: https://github.com/avg-I/freebsd/compare/master...review/no-cyclic.diff
>
> The only user of cyclic now is DTrace profile provider, so I am converting it to
> use our improved callout(9).  cyclic is almost a complete implementation of an
> alternative to our callout(9), so having that big chunk of foreign code which
> duplicates a core function is not nice.
>
> One thing that I am not sure about is what PROF_ARTIFICIAL_FRAMES should be on
> different platforms.  Also, I am not sure if the number of interrupt, timer, etc
> frames depends on a timer being used.  I'd appreciate any help on this.

Can you create a reviews.freebsd.org patch for this?

Thanks,
George
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-dtrace/attachments/20141009/1290bac4/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-dtrace mailing list