[Bug 252812] bhyve(8) doesn't mention vale but it appears to be supported
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Mon Jan 18 19:44:22 UTC 2021
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252812
Bug ID: 252812
Summary: bhyve(8) doesn't mention vale but it appears to be
supported
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Many People
Priority: ---
Component: Manual Pages
Assignee: bugs at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: okiddle at yahoo.co.uk
CC: doc at FreeBSD.org
It appears to be perfectly possible to pass, e.g. -s 5,virtio-net,vale0:vm1 to
bhyve and it will create a virtualised network attached to a VALE switch. It
should be listed in bhyve(8) alongside the tapN, vmnetN and (for FreeBSD 13)
netgraph options.
In practice, I didn't get very far when trying to get it to work. Attaching my
physical interface with valectl -h appeared not to work so perhaps that depends
on driver support. I think I had it working for networking between VMs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list