The future of the roff toolchain
Mike Karels
mike at karels.net
Sun May 21 22:34:55 UTC 2017
On 21 May 2017, at 15:36, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:57:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> What I want to propose now, it to render them as PDF (html?) once and
>> push them
>> somewhere (to be defined) as static document on our documentation
>> website.
>> Please doceng@ provide me a location where to push them.
>>
>> And then remove bsd.doc.mk from FreeBSD 12.0 along with the removal
>> of groff.
>> I also want to remove most of roff related tools (the one provided by
>> toolchains
>> available in ports) for which we kept a BSD version (not really
>> maintained in
>> base):
>> namely:
>> - checknr
>> - vgrind
>> - colcrt
>>
>> Only keeping:
>> - col (useful in other places than roff)
>> - soelim (also used for manpages and we have a clean BSD licensed
>> version which
>> is also now parts of mandoc)
>
> That sounds like a good plan to me. Thank you for putting in all
> the time trying out the alternate roff toolchains!
+1. I agree that /usr/share/doc is strictly legacy; only the man pages
matter for base.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arch at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list