docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T
Mark Linimon
linimon at lonesome.com
Sat May 24 17:20:02 UTC 2014
The following reply was made to PR docs/188214; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Linimon <linimon at lonesome.com>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens
when no -t or -T
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 12:11:17 -0500
----- Forwarded message from Tom Rhodes <trhodes at FreeBSD.org> -----
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 12:32:04 -0400
From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes at FreeBSD.org>
To: Allan Jude <allanjude at freebsd.org>
Cc: freebsd-doc at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2)
> Suggesting that it 'attempts to detect' may give the wrong impression.
> Someone would have to look at the source of fsck(8) to be sure.
So, in theory, an attempt to parse /etc/fstab would be
an attempt to detect the type; however, my quick glance
at the code showed no real parsing of fstab. But in
my case, I followed to both the T and t flags, and just
glanced at what was done would they not be specified.
That was really as far as I got, and I attempted to use
very generic language in case it only does one, or the
other, or both. :)
Reasonable?
--
Tom Rhodes
_______________________________________________
freebsd-doc at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
----- End forwarded message -----
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list