mount_unionfs(8)

[Alexander Yerenkow]

No, it's not stable and it can easily make local DOS, even from jail, if
user-mounts allowed. Until sych things are fixed, let's that scary text be
there :)

Regards, Alexander Yerenkow
24 мая 2014 г. 12:24 пользователь "Andrew Berg" <
aberg010 at my.hennepintech.edu> написал:

> What is the state of unionfs? There was apparently a big reimplementation
> of it
> that was merged in when 7 was -CURRENT, but there is absolutely no mention
> of
> this in the man page, which is dated November 30, 2006, and has a big scary
> warning:
> THIS FILE SYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK)
> AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM.  USE AT YOUR OWN
> RISK.  BEWARE OF DOG.  SLIPPERY WHEN WET.  BATTERIES NOT INCLUDED.
>
> This leaves me highly confused. Was the man page really never updated in
> the
> last 7+ years? Is unionfs as it is in 10.0-RELEASE stable and functional?
> If
> the man page really is outdated and the big scary warning is not
> appropriate,
> what are the valid options, and what are the known bugs (if any) that
> should be
> noted in the man page?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-doc at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>